For Law Enforcement

Twelve years building alongside law enforcement.

My Mobile Witness has been developing intelligence infrastructure in direct partnership with operational law enforcement agencies since 2014. This isn't a technology company that discovered the public safety market.

The domain expertise how fusion centers actually work, where analyst workflows break down, what field officers will and won't adopt comes from twelve years of operational partnership. Not from a requirements document.

Patrol cars with lights on along a residential street at night
Patrol units, residential street

Domain Knowledge

What twelve years of LE partnership means operationally.

Analyst workflows break at volume, not complexity.

In high-volume tip environments, the bottleneck isn't analyst skill; it's queue management. Analysts can't maintain context across fragmented intake streams. The failure mode is organizational, not individual.

Community campaigns create intake spikes.

When an agency runs a public tip campaign, volume can spike significantly in 48 hours. The system must absorb that without degrading analyst throughput or losing tips. Most platforms aren't built for this operational reality.

Partner sharing runs on trust frameworks, not data pipes.

Intelligence doesn't move between agencies on technical merit alone. Routing expectations, notification norms, and relationship protocols are operational constraints the system must accommodate or agencies won't use the sharing function.

Command-level approval requires operational justification.

LE leadership evaluates tools differently than IT leadership. The approval process involves procurement, legal, and command sign-off in that order, with different concerns at each stage. Technical specs don't close the deal.

Field officers don't return to a desk.

Mobile intelligence intake has to work in actual field conditions: variable connectivity, one-handed operation, time pressure. Tools designed for office conditions fail in the field and officers stop using them.

Founded
2014 · United States
First LE Deployment
2015 · State law enforcement
GBI / GISAC Deployment
2018 · Georgia · See the case study →
Active Network
2024 · 14 states

Architecture Decisions

Architecture decisions that come from operating in fusion centers.

Intake design
Why ISX uses a single analyst queue.

Analysts in high-volume environments can't manage separate queues per source. Fragmentation isn't just inconvenient it loses intelligence. ISX unifies all intake because the alternative is a system that works until it matters most.

Outbound routing
Why ISX routes to all partners simultaneously.

Intelligence that reaches one partner in isolation loses investigative value. Simultaneous routing isn't a convenience feature it reflects how LE sharing actually works when time between tip and action is the operational variable.

Processing standard
Why ISX is built around a 15-minute processing target.

In time-sensitive threat scenarios, the gap between tip received and analyst action is operationally meaningful. 15 minutes isn't a benchmark; it's a design constraint the entire platform is architected around.

Field intake
Why See Send is designed for field conditions, not office conditions.

Field officers don't return to a desk to submit intelligence. See Send is built for intermittent connectivity, rapid one-handed submission, and no office workflow assumed because that's where the intelligence actually originates.

What it takes to run an anonymous tip line →

Next Step

Ready to see ISX in the context of your agency's operations?

Agency briefings are command-level conversations: your operational context, your questions, no demo script. We bring a senior team member familiar with fusion center operations.

Request an Agency Briefing

We respond to all briefing requests within one business day.